The rise of the administrative state

Power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Many nations in the Arab world and in Africa are now in crisis due to democratic uprisings against tyrannical rule. Unfortunately, when one despot is overthrown, another takes his place (revolutionaries themselves become the new tyrants). Indeed, it is in the nature of man’s fallen humanity. And the evil one wastes no time in corrupting those who rise with idealistic zeal.

The democratic separation of powers is indeed necessary to preserve the rule of law, and to preserve peace and unity in the state. Such balance among the executive, legislative and judiciary finds its inspiration in the Bible. “Indeed the Lord will be there with us, majestic; yes, the Lord our judge, the Lord our lawgiver, the Lord our king, he it is who will save us.” (Is 33:22). In the end, the system works only if government officials are truly in the Lord. Only Jesus, who has won salvation for us, can save us — from our sinful selves, from the allure of worldly power, from the oppression of the enemy.


Executive unbound: The rise of the administrative state

Chuck Colson Mon Apr 11 11:50 EST Opinion

April 11, 2011 ( – Do you think government power over your life is increasing? Well, more is on the way, and a new movement of “elite” thinkers are all for it. The case is set out in a new book Executive Unbound, by historian Eric Posner and law professor Adrian Vermuele, who analyze the rise of what they call the “administrative state.”

In their book, Posner and Vermuele argue that the separation of powers, which the Founders, especially James Madison, devised as a bulwark against tyranny has “eroded beyond recognition.” In its place, we have a dominant executive branch and a marginalized Congress and judiciary.

Virtually every scholar, liberal and conservative, would agree with this assessment. The difference is that, instead of urging a “return to the Madisonian system” enshrined in the Constitution, Posner and Vermuele defend the administrative state and, if anything, urge that it be strengthened!

That’s because they and other political elites believe that “only a powerful executive can address the economic and security challenges of modern times.”

This movement toward an all-powerful executive is taking place just below the surface, and we’re seeing evidence of it in the current administration’s power grabs. An obvious example is the president’s recent declaration that the Defense of Marriage Act was unconstitutional, a judgment reserved, of course, for the judiciary.

And there’s no doubt that executive agencies have an increasing say over how ordinary people live their lives. What the executive can’t achieve in Congress, it enforces through the administrative state, bypassing the will of the people. The erosion of liberty is unmistakable.

It’s also not what the Founders, like Madison, intended. Madison believed that the separation of powers was necessary to preserve the rule of law. An all-powerful executive would become tyrannical, not because the president himself was a tyrant, but because with that much power, government can’t help but act in tyrannical ways.

The anthropology behind the Founders’ view, like belief in the rule of law, is a legacy of Christianity, which taught the West a realistic understanding of human nature—that is, that man is a fallen creature.

In a New York Times book review, Harvard Professor Harvey Mansfield points out that Posner and Vermuele believe the Constitution “no longer corresponds to reality,” and that we can all trust that the “president as a rational actor is still constrained through public opinion and politics . . . So there is no solid reason to fear executive tyranny.”

But far from restraining the administrative state, public opinion in part has made it possible. Few people want to admit it, but Americans of all political stripes have what Mansfield calls a “love-hate relationship” with the administrative state. They love it when it makes them feel secure and hate it when it makes someone else feel secure.

It brings to mind “The Inquisitor’s Tale” from The Brothers Karamazov. In it, the Grand Inquisitor tells Jesus that men don’t want to be free, as Jesus preached, they want to be safe. Meet that need and they’ll gladly give you power.

I can only pray the American people are not about to sell their freedom for this mess of potentially tyrannical pottage. But be warned, friends: it’s gaining steam in law schools, among liberal scholars and in this Administration.

This article reprinted with permission from

“For to me to live is Christ, and to die is gain.” (Phil 1:21)



Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: